









|

Foreword - Professor Sir Netar Mallick
End stage renal failure (ESRF) arises from a variety
of renal disorders and is fatal if untreated. Dialysis or transplantation
reduce the toxic metabolic burden which results when the kidneys fail and
preserve life. Transplantation in addition restores other functions of the
kidney, including Erythropoietin and Vitamin D production. The quality of
that preserved life varies according to the efficiency of the treatment
and the co-morbidity of the patient. Studies confirm that the quality of
life experienced by the patient is often acceptable despite objective evidence
of residual disability.
In the UK between 1993 and 1998 the number of patients with ESRF receiving
treatment rose from a prevalence of 396 to 539 per million population (PMP).
The incident rate of new patients rose from 67 to 92 pmp. It has proved
possible to treat patients who, through age or co-morbidity, have disabilities
which would previously have been judged to make the management of their
renal disease too intrusive.
This is a success story. However, it is clear from the data in Wales and
Scotland and from valid international comparison that, in both quantity
and quality, the service provided for the management of renal disease in
England still lags behind to an unacceptable degree. The government has
laid down criteria by which health services will be judged. These include:
 |
Health improvement |
 |
Fair access |
 |
Effective delivery of appropriate
healthcare |
 |
Efficiency |
 |
Patient/carer experience |
 |
Health outcomes of NHS care |
We welcome this framework and present details of our own assessment of the
current provision of renal services in relation to it. Our analysis reveals
that much of the infrastructure which has been developed to treat ESRF in
the UK generally, is sound. However, the analysis also shows that too few
patients are receiving treatment, that some of this treatment is inadequate
when judged by objective criteria and expert opinion and that there are
glaring inequalities in access to services and in the quality of the service
across the country.
We have developed a vision of Equity and Excellence in Renal
Services which we hope will commend itself to government and its agencies
as a goal to work towards if we are to offer a compassionate, yet evidence
based service to these patients, who without treatment are mortally ill.
We call for timely action to improve equity and quality in renal services
which are currently under threat from a negative spiral of rising need,
limited access and falling quality.

|